Today's Tri-fecta

Living in the Philadelphia area, I sill receive the Inquirer. Surprise, surprise to see the following articles in one Sports page:

1) Ian Laperriere is out for the year with post-concussion syndrome:

Laperriere, 36, has been dealing with post-concussion symptoms since last season... "I thought the summer would take care of it," Laperriere said. "I had some headaches here and there. But I would always find reasons - like, well, it's probably because I was dehydrated or because I worked out too hard today or I'm tired....It was always a reason. But I had to come down to [the fact that] it wasn't all those reasons."

2) Chris Nowinski's work on steps to protect kids from the effects of repetitive concussion:

"The NFL has made enormous changes," Nowinski said. "The biggest things they've done have been with youth policy and the example they're trying to set, the fact they've done public service announcements, the educational posters they'd put up, telling players to not go back in [after suffering a concussion], report it. That's been amazing."

...Nowinski isn't looking to ban contact sports. He only wants restrictions on the contact.

"One hundred percent, tomorrow, if you stop kids from getting hit in the head over and over"

3). New legislation in Pennsylvania on concussion management for kids:

The Pennsylvania House on Tuesday passed the Safety In Youth Sports Act, which calls for Pennsylvania high school or junior high school athletes who suffer a concussion or brain injury to be cleared by a medical professional trained in concussion management before returning to the sport.

...the legislation would require athletes and their parents or guardians to sign a concussion and head-injury information sheet before participating in a sport. It also would require coaches to complete a concussion certification course.

The Wrong Dangers?

Lisa Belkin, NY Times columnist, debates whether parents are focusing on thee wrong dangers, in her article Keeping Kids Safe from the Wrong Dangers:

we seem all the more determined yet befuddled when it comes to the safety of our children. For instance, the five things most likely to cause injury to children up to age 18, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, are: car accidents, homicide (usually at the hands of someone they know), child abuse, suicide or drowning. And what are the five things that parents are most worried about (according to surveys by the Mayo Clinic)? Kidnapping, school snipers, terrorists, dangerous strangers and drugs.

Since I agree that driving is the most dangerous activity we expose our kids to, I essentially agree with the following:

“The least safe thing you can do with your child, statistically, is drive them somewhere,” said Lenore Skenazy" ...yet every time we put them in the car we don’t think, ‘Oh God, maybe I should take public transportation instead, because if something happened to my kid on the way to the orthodontist I could never forgive myself.’ ”

However, I cannot agree with the following logic:

... last week’s link between teenage football and chronic traumatic encephalopathy... So far, there is only one case... you can’t really make a recommendation based on one case. So it’s up to a young player’s parents to decide.

It isn't one case, it is several. Tau proteins do not magically enter the brains of 18-year-old athletes, and they do not magically enter the brains of former NFL players. Rather, they represent a reaction to repetitive, unnatural forces to the head.

Do you think former NFL player Matt Bowen is worrying about the wrong dangers?

I can deal with (the headaches) now, but 10 years, 20 years down the road? That's when I can tell you if it was worth it.

Was it really worth it? Back when I was still playing football, I would say yes. Sharing a locker room with players such as Brett Favre, Marshall Faulk and Kurt Warner is special.

But now, as a husband and father who has headaches at the age of 35, I can't give you an answer. I'm too scared.

Shouldn't parents be concerned that their kids may not be able to be parents themselves?

Concussion Policy vs. Procedure

Isn't it great that the NFL has a new concussion policy that requires independent medical evaluation prior to returning a player to play after sustaining a concussion?

"Once removed for the duration of a practice or game, the player should not be considered for return-to-football activities until he is fully asymptotic, both at rest and after exertion, has a normal neurological examination, normal neuropsychological testing, and has been cleared to return by both his team physician(s) and the independent neurological consultant."

Perhaps the Philadelphia Eagles trainers and coaches did not receive this memo, or stay awake at mandatory training sessions. After seeing Stewart Bradley and Kevin Kolb sustain concussions and return to play in the same game, you have to wonder.

At least the Philly sports writers recognize the dangers in having a head coach completely ignorant of sports-concussion symptoms:

"They were fine," coach Andy Reid said after the game. "All the questions that they answered and the things they did with the docs registered well. As it went on, they weren't feeling well so we took them out."

If either of them had taken a hit after returning to the game despite concussions, the Eagles' coaches and medical staff could be answering some much tougher questions today than whether Michael Vick will start at quarterback next week.